AE Spiritual Knowledge Management
In our research we particularly focus in on the following topics:
1. Vision Development
Knowledge-based Vision Development on the individual level
The development of Shared Visions in organizations as organizational learning process
To this end we have developed two methods BerufungscoachingWaVe and Vikobama that we have used and tested over many years in a number of projects. To ensure the continuous development of these methods we engage in a dialogue between practice (data, evaluations) and academia in the sense of the action research paradigm. The regular cooperation with our practice partner WaVe – Zentrum für Wachstum und Veränderung (Center for Growth and Change) allows us to integrate valuable data from numerous vision development processes into our scientific research.
Listed below are some selected publications that fit in this thematic scope:
Kaiser,A., Towards a Knowledge-Based Theory of Developing Sustainable Visions: The Theory Wave
A full list of publications can be found here.
2. Organizational Becoming and Organizational Self-enactment as Organizational (Deep) Learning Processes
This headline describes our interest in the development towards a "best version of itself" of an organization and also the forms and types of knowledge that are required in this process.
Closely related topics such as Purposing, Vocationing, the Aesthetics of Organizational Purpose, Calling, Becoming, Change or Learning from the Future and Self-transcending Knowledge show that this is a strongly interdisciplinary field. We attempt to approach this topics from a very holistic knowledge-based management perspective that we think, provides interesting new insights of the mentioned topics. Recent research by Ikujiro Nonaka on "The Wise Company" or "Phronetic Leadership", or by Constantin Bratianu on "Spiritual Knowledge" takes a similar path and indicates that our approach aims in the right direction.
Some of our first publications on this topics include the following:
3. Purpose Measurement
Behind this term, which may seem a bit odd at first glance, lies the idea to look at the topic of Purpose from a somewhat more formal perspective. In short, it is about developing a measuring instrument that provides information about how well an individual or an organization follows its "real" purpose in the sense of a decision support or monitoring system. In other words, the measurement to be developed should provide information about how close a person or an organization is to the "best version of himself/herself" or "itself". Without doubt, this research project is a challenging undertaking for many reasons. Especially due to the fact that the "best version" is continuously and dynamically developing and is in this sense something "fluid". Therefore, many aspects of the aforementioned research areas will also be of relevance here. As for the individual level of analysis of this research area, the accompanying work with BerufungscoachingWaVe (vocational coaching) again provides a valuable source of research data for us. We are certainly far from a concise solution here at the moment, but a lot of desire, joy and excitement went into the work on this topic recently.
However our efforts already culminated in a first publication on the topic:
Baumgartner,L. and Kaiser,A., The measurement of meaningfulness
4. Need knowledge a strategic tool
In this area of research, we explore a very specific type of knowledge that we call need knowledge. It is about the organizational knowledge about their essential needs as an organization. The high potential of need knowledge has already been shown in numerous projects, experiments and scientific works. A major notable advantage is that recognizing essential needs and generating explicit knowledge about them enables sustainable and innovative solutions.
This means that changes and developments in social systems (organizations, companies, industries, areas of communities/cities, etc.) work particularly well and sustainably, if the needs of the system have been made explicit beforehand because only then can measures and their implementations be tailored to the needs of the organization. A big advantage also lies in the drastic enlargement of the space of possibilities regarding measures and/or actions, since there are usually many different ways of conversion that allow the satisfaction of a single need.
With our method Bewextra, we have been able to support many different organizations in numerous projects by externalizing the organizational need knowledge. This regularly led to a completely new foundation for sustainable decisions and change processes.
Our current research in this area mainly focuses on the ongoing development and optimization of the Bewextra method towards a complete decision support system for large and very large organizations.
We have already published a variety of articles in this area as. Three should be highlighted here:
Kragulj,F., A Knowledge Perspective on Needs to Enhance Organizational Learning
An overview of all our publications can be found here.